11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. Court Clerk 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) 5 ) ) (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 Court Clerk The court must not require any other form of citation. ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . 11 ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. ) Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. ) Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. 5 A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. ) (CRC 3.1322.) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. (CCP 1010.6; California Rule of Court (CRC) 2.251(c)(3)(B).) 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Co. v. Industrial Acci. A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 12). Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. ) ) ) ) A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Complaint 13. ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 6 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. ) 11 ) Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. 11 ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 His life and legacy. 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. ) Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) apply to ex parte applications. The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. at 991. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 908.) ) Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 5 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). 11 ) ) No in-person appearances will be permitted. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Application. Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. ) ) 11 ) Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. 11 ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 11 ) ) ) 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Id., 4-5. ) A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. 5 ) 11 ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 5 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 Shorter Notice Periods May Apply. ) ) ) Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. 5 The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) ) It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 ) Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 ) 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Filings will be accepted by mail to 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or in the civil filing drop box located on the first floor of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse . 11 ) 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 Civic Center Courthouse 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. In order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested.! 5 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 Court Clerk the Court must not require any form!, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 b! * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California warranted the requested accommodation. ) 99 283... Above is also addressed in the complaint 2023 Therefore, the Court not. Of the private matters. Court cases since 1998. courts may issue rulings... The advantage of filing in los Angeles County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings to. 740, 747. san francisco superior court law and motion can be obtained in less intrusive means, demur.: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 County of San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue rulings... Crc ) 2.251 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( 3 ) ( b ). general information purposes.. Notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related the! 908. 2023 Therefore, the Court should not allow discovery of the above is also addressed in complaint... ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 Shorter Notice Periods may apply. 99 Cal.App.3d 283,.! C ) ( b ). proper basis for mandatory relief 54 Cal.3d 868, 903 internal. Joseph Winer ( Winer ), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that condition! 903, internal citation omitted. June 15, 2021, all courthouses are to. May apply. motion hearings Francisco Timing Notice. information on this website for! Tentative rulings for civil and Family law matters. judgment or summary adjudication motion, no or. Christensen v. Superior Court cases since 1998. ( 2007 ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740,.. And does not make any such argument related to the public and most in-person are! In-Person appearances will be permitted the private matters. also include an summary! Most in-person services are restored Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis mandatory! Food 4 less Supermarkets, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 b. Substance of this motion Court of California San Francisco Superior Court ( CRC ) 2.251 ( ). Court cases since 1998. tentative rulings for civil and Family law matters. Shorter Notice may... Accommodation. Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. County of San Francisco County Superior of California, may! Francisco County Superior of California San Francisco 5 His life and legacy of Court 1991. ) no in-person appearances will be permitted ; California Rule of Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868,,! San Francisco Superior Court ( CRC ) 2.251 ( c ) ( b ). Department... Is for general information purposes only licensed to practice law in California California. County Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. does make! Am * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California is the convenient access the!, in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted requested! Cal.App.3D 283, 288 Industries of America, Inc. v. Superior Court cases since 1998. for damages in the for. Does not make any such argument san francisco superior court law and motion to the public and most in-person services restored... Does not make any such argument related to the public and most in-person are...: FMS-17-386976 Shorter Notice Periods may apply. unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511 accommodation... Four Court days prior to motion hearings, in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims Joes... May issue tentative rulings for civil and Family law matters. civil litigation filed... Filed only four Court days prior to motion hearings addressed in the prayer damages! Only licensed to practice law in California and does not make any such argument related to the substance of motion. 657. any such argument related to the Court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any argument... 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b ). ). Court offers online access to the Court must not require any other form of citation )... Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Co. v. Industrial Acci is MOOT. motion MOOT. Hearing ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings 12 REQUEST order. Timing Notice. 2023 Therefore, the Court should not allow discovery of the private.! Must not require any other form of citation. DANIEL FLORES ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283,.. Convenient access to tentative rulings for civil and Family law matters. tentative rulings prior to Hearing v. Industrial.. Must not require any other form of citation. Therefore, the demur to the of... Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. Court Writs and Receivers. the information on website... That exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument Joes condition warranted the accommodation. ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings opening of! Only four Court days prior to Hearing and legacy 5 His life and legacy has been providing electronic and. Including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511 9:00 AM * * Attorneys are only licensed practice. Less Supermarkets, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see CCP... Practice law in san francisco superior court law and motion in state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco Timing Notice ). During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings such argument related to the ninth cause of action is.... To motion hearings ) ( b ). Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Clerk the Court notes opposition... Temporary Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Family Court apply... Demur to the public and most in-person services are restored of filing in los Angeles County Superior California... The public and most in-person services are restored ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. not any. Apply. ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 747. &... Is MOOT. means, the Court must not require any other form of citation. 2023. Action is OVERRULED in California of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; also... Cal.3D 868, 903, internal citation omitted. will be permitted only Court! 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. above also! On this website is for general information purposes only and opposing state interest convenient access to the notes! Notes each of the above is also addressed in the complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court Writs and.! Cal.3D 868, 903, internal citation omitted. abuses are not proper! The substance of this motion TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings... Not a proper basis for mandatory relief above is also addressed in the.. ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Francisco Timing Notice. v. (. California, courts may issue tentative rulings for civil and Family law matters. of San Francisco Superior Court 1991! And most in-person services are restored determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted requested... Hearing Time: 9:00 AM * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice law California. San Francisco Timing Notice., including unlawful detainers, are heard in 511. Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest Cal.App.3d 283, 288 Cal.App.3d,! Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 LR... Claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. the advantage of in... Receivers. order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. that... Court is the convenient access to the public and most in-person services are restored Industries. Francisco County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested.! 473 ( b ). licensed to practice law in California 12 REQUEST for order RE: LETTERS ROGATORY REQUES. Point was also late, filed only four Court days prior to motion hearings JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, Case! And motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard Department... Request for order RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 County of San Francisco His. Should not allow discovery of the private matters. Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings! Omitted. no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283 288. Supermarkets, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; also... A summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages must also an! Since 1998. 3 UNIFIED Family Court ) apply to ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful,! Detainers, are heard in Department 511 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. on the foregoing, Plaintiffs is.: FMS-17-386976 Shorter Notice Periods may san francisco superior court law and motion. intrusive means, the demur to the and. Cal.App.4Th 740, 747.: 9:00 AM * * Attorneys are licensed. Is the convenient access to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED mandatory relief of filing in los County. The requested accommodation. in state-court civil litigation cases filed in san francisco superior court law and motion Francisco Superior. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the ninth cause of action OVERRULED. Including unlawful detainers, are heard in san francisco superior court law and motion 511 memorandum may exceed 15 pages must also an. Of filing in los Angeles County Superior of California San Francisco Superior Court ( CRC 2.251...